BLENDED PROGRAM BACHELOR'S DEGREE AND
MULTIPLE SUBJECT / CLAD CREDENTIAL
ASSESSMENT PLAN
Candidate Admissions Assessments
Knowledge and Skills:
Requirements for
"Provisional Admission" into Junior Year include the following:
Lower Division General Education and Area
courses
California Code
(U.S. History/Constitution) History I 10 1 or equivalent
Verification of Early
Field Experience: TED 1500 or equivalent course, or documented minimum 40 hours
in K‑8 classroom
Minimum GPA of 2.9 in college coursework
Two letters of
recommendation from professors and/or school professionals
Submission of
Candidate's essay on reasons for wanting to enter the Blended Program
Transcripts of all college work
Evaluation of candidate's appropriateness
for the Blended Program including: Recent Math courses Accustomed to taking
full‑time load of college courses (4+ courses per quarter/semester)
Satisfied foreign language requirement for CLAD
Dispositions:
Preliminary evaluation of
candidate's appropriateness for the Blended Program, including recent Math
course and ability to handle a full academic load Assess, through formal
interview with Liberal Studies Director, potential for desire to continue
learning. Learning and application of concepts of diversity and technology
Ability to develop learning community (with other members of cohort)
Candidate
Mid‑Point Assessments (prior to "Final
Admission in
Senior Year
Knowledge and Skills:
Maintain minimum
GPA of 3.0 in all TED courses, 2.9 in all other courses
Pass CBEST Exam
Interview with Teacher Education Team Leader
and
BCLAD Team Leader (where appropriate)
Completion of 80% of the Liberal Studies
Credential
Track Major including Math 4021
Pass WST (Writing Skills Test or
coursework)
Dispositions:
Interview with Multiple Subject
Team Leader ‑ appropriateness for continued learning and application of knowledge
skills and concepts to student teaching in classrooms
Candidate
Exit Assessments
Knowledge and Skills:
Pass RICA examination
Completion of all requirements for Liberal
Studies Credential Track Major (with minimum GPA)
Completion of all requirements for Preliminary
Multiple Subject/CLAD Teaching Credential
Minimum GPA of 3.0 in all Teacher Credential
courses Successful completion of Field Experience (Student Teaching) with
satisfactory evaluations
Multiple Subject Summative
Assessment Portfolios
Credential Portfolio
Exit Survey, Liberal Studies
Dispositions:
Summative Assessment for MSAT, which includes
comprehensive Portfolio
Teacher Education Portfolio evaluation (on‑line)
Candidate
Follow‑up Assessments
Ongoing
contact with graduates in the field
Periodic
surveys of graduates and employers
Graduates
to be included on Blended Program Advisory
Council
PROGRAM ASSESSMENT
Assessment Issues and Outcome
Criteria:
1. Students' rate of progress
toward completion of the program and credential requirements
*Students in the Blended Program
will graduate with a BA and Preliminary Multiple Subject/CLAD Credential in a
shorter period of time than the overall average time to graduation in
"traditional" programs.
2. The rate of student retention
in the program.
*Retention rates of students in
the Blended Program will surpass the overall retention rates in
"traditional" programs.
3. The relative level of student
knowledge of both subject matter and pedagogical skills.
*Students in the Blended Program
will perform at least as well as students in "traditional" programs
as measured by GPA and by faculty assessment of student knowledge, and by
Master/Mentor teacher assessment of students' knowledge as demonstrated in the
process of teaching.
4. The students' performance in
the field.
*Students will achieve higher
ratings by field supervisors and Master Teachers in preparation and readiness
for teaching as compared to "traditional" teacher preparation
programs.
1 5. The students' success in
securing full time positions.
*Students will demonstrate a level
at least equal to that of "traditional" students in securing full
time positions.
6. Faculty satisfaction with
students' academic and professional skills performance.
*Assessment of faculty
satisfaction with the quality of preparation and with their teaching
experiences will be positive and demonstrate faculty perception that the
Blended Program has benefits over "traditional" programs.
7. The extent to which the faculty
draw intellectual connections between subject matter and related ideas about
knowing, teaching and learning.
*Review of the curriculum and
instructional activities of the courses in the Blended Program will reveal a
substantial focus on the development of connections between subject matter and
related ideas about knowing, teaching and learning.
8. The extent to which students
meet the California Standards for the Teaching Profession.
*Students in the Blended Program
will surpass students in "traditional" programs against the
California Standards for the Teaching Profession.
9. The extent to which the Program
is found acceptable by the Committee on Accreditation and approved by the CCTC.
*The Blended Program at CSUH
received "accelerated approval" by CCTC January 25, 2000 and initial
accreditation June 29, 2001 per the "Interim Standards for Blended
Programs".
9. The extent to which campuses
engage faculty from education and arts, letters and sciences equitably in
program development, assessment and management.
*CSUH will demonstrate continuous
and meaningful involvement of faculty from the disciplines included in the
program as demonstrated by program records of participation, interviews with
faculty, assessment of course content, and student feedback.
10. The extent to which the
students perform successfully on the Reading Instruction Competency Assessment.
*Students in the Blended Program
will surpass students in "traditional" programs in their performance
on the RICA.
11. The extent to which CSUH
involves their K‑ 12 and community college partners in meaningful and
substantive engagement in program development and assessment, and in the
recruitment and placement of candidates.
*CSUH will demonstrate continuous
and meaningful involvement of K‑12 and community college representatives
included in the program, including participation in the Blended Program Advisory
Council.
12. Program Mid‑point
Assessment by students. Since the program is new, cohorts have the opportunity
to assess the program and suggest modifications.
Program
Assessment ‑ External Factors
Best Practices and Research
Multiple
Subject Credential Program Handbook
Professional Standards
California
Commission on Teacher Credentialing
California
Standards for the Teaching Profession
Professional Standards for the
Accreditation of Schools, Colleges, and Departments of Education ‑ NCATE
(National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education)
Professional
Organizations
Council on
Teacher Education
AERA
ATE